PUBLISHED ASSESSMENT

Narcissistic rivalry was associated with negative attitudes toward psychological help via cold feelings toward mental health professionals, while narcissistic admiration was associated with more favorable attitudes, in samples from Poland and the United States

This compact public record contains an assessment and source links. It does not contain article text, reader identity, browsing history, or private notes.

Historical provenance limit: this assessment has a recorded retrieval URL from before Beaconwright’s current publisher-verification boundary. It has not been reverified under the current boundary.

Open original article

The article closely reflects the underlying study and clearly presents its three samples, principal associations, and major causal limitations. Its strongest weakness is missing quantitative and methodological detail: effect sizes, recruitment, representativeness, preregistration, and robustness checks are absent. Several mechanistic statements are plausible but slightly stronger than cross-sectional mediation evidence supports.

Evidence support

Strong (83/100)

The sample sizes, countries, study structure, principal associations, and mediation findings closely match the published study abstract and indexed text.
The article appropriately distinguishes narcissistic admiration from rivalry.
It accurately states that the cross-sectional, self-reported findings do not establish causality or actual treatment behavior.
Some language—such as calling rivalry a barrier or saying feelings are directly tied to decisions—is stronger than the observational evidence warrants.

Balance & context

Substantial (76/100)

The article prominently explains the observational design, self-report limitations, and distinction between attitudes and behavior.
It identifies uncertainty about why admiration relates to favorable attitudes.
It omits effect sizes, alternative confounders, sample representativeness, prior therapy experience, and detailed measurement limitations.
The broad contrast between normalized US care and constrained Polish care is directionally supported but insufficiently qualified.

Transparency

Substantial (68/100)

The author, publication date, journal, study title, researchers, sample sizes, countries, and general methods are clearly identified.
The article explains the measured constructs and gives example questionnaire items.
It provides no DOI or direct study link and omits statistical estimates, participant recruitment, funding, conflicts, preregistration, and data-access information.

Confidence and coverage

Confidence in this analysis: Moderate confidence

Evidence coverage: Substantial coverage

The publisher blocked direct inspection of the full article tables and supplementary materials.
Effect sizes, confidence intervals, recruitment details, and robustness analyses could not be independently checked.

The central reporting was verified against the publisher’s indexed study content and preprint metadata.
Full results tables and supplementary materials were inaccessible, limiting verification of detailed interpretations.

Sources considered

Only the weak need help? The role of narcissistic rivalry in attitudes toward psychological help — Primary journal record supporting the study design, samples, central findings, authorship, funding, and declared conflicts.
Only the Weak Need Help? The Role of Narcissistic Rivalry in Attitudes Toward Psychological Help — preprint record — Confirms preprint metadata, authors, date, DOI, and abstract.
Giving mental health the attention it deserves – Poland adopts WHO tool — Documents stigma, workforce shortages, long waits, and unmet mental-health needs in Poland.
Towards a community-based model of mental health care in Poland: findings of the rapid assessment — Provides current authoritative context on coordination, access, workforce, and service-delivery gaps in Poland.
Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry: An Interpersonal Approach to Construct Validation — Provides independent construct-validation context for treating admiration and rivalry as distinct dimensions.
Recognition and Resistance in Early Psychotherapeutic Encounters — Related experimental evidence connects rivalry with resistance and lower perceived recognition while also showing that therapy-engagement effects can be more complex than simple avoidance.

This assesses evidence and presentation; it is not an overall truth verdict.

Reassess

⚠ Paid reassessment incurs a charge. Opening this page does not start a run or incur a charge.

To request a new assessment, sign in to My library, watch this record, and select Request new assessment. Requests await separate approval and do not themselves start a paid run.

A new assessment may differ. Earlier published results remain in history.

Open My library

Assessment history

Published assessment trend

Available public snapshots only; this is not a count of all executions. Corrections may include earlier scores. Gaps mean not scored or not recorded. Different scores do not establish changed source evidence.

Evidence support — solid blueBalance & context — dashed purpleTransparency — dotted green

Reassess ⚠

Recorded public scores (0–100)
Date	Evidence support	Balance & context	Transparency
2026-09-23 (current)	83	76	68