PUBLISHED ASSESSMENT

Iran protest deaths may amount to crimes against humanity, EU parliament says | Iran International

This compact public record contains an assessment and source links. It does not contain article text, reader identity, browsing history, or private notes.

Open original article

The article accurately and cautiously reports the European Parliament’s February 12, 2026 resolution, and independent reporting supports extensive lethal repression. Its principal weakness is extreme brevity: it provides no resolution link, casualty methodology, legal distinction or Iranian response. Evidence support is strong, while balance and transparency remain mixed.

Evidence support

Strong (86/100)

The official European Parliament resolution confirms the date, systematic-repression characterization and crimes-against-humanity assessment.
The article’s cautious phrase “may amount to” is no stronger than the resolution, which says documented acts meet that threshold.
Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Associated Press reporting independently support the occurrence of extensive killings and repression.
The article avoids asserting a disputed numerical death toll.

Balance & context

Mixed (48/100)

The claim is clearly attributed to the European Parliament and appropriately qualified.
The article omits the resolution’s evidentiary basis and the wide range of reported death estimates.
It does not explain that the resolution is a political determination rather than a judicial finding.
Iran’s lower official toll and its attribution of many deaths to armed or foreign-backed actors are absent.

Transparency

Mixed (42/100)

The publication and update times are supplied, and the European Parliament is clearly identified.
No author is named.
The resolution’s title, reference number, relevant passages and voting information are not provided or linked in the supplied text.
The article does not identify the sources or methods behind reports of killings.

Confidence and coverage

Confidence in this analysis: High confidence

Evidence coverage: Substantial coverage

The supplied article text appears limited to a headline, caption and one substantive paragraph, with unrelated headlines intermixed.
Restricted access and disrupted communications in Iran prevented independent confirmation of a definitive death toll.

The narrow central claim can be checked directly against an official European Parliament resolution.
Multiple independent sources document killings and uncertainty over their scale.
Confidence is lower regarding whether the supplied extraction omitted additional article text.

Sources considered

European Parliament resolution of 12 February 2026 on systemic oppression in Iran — Primary record confirming systematic repression, casualty estimates and Parliament’s crimes-against-humanity language.
Iran: Deaths and injuries rise amid authorities’ renewed cycle of protest bloodshed — Joint Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch investigation documenting unlawful shootings, deaths and arrests.
Iran: Massacre of protesters demands global diplomatic action to signal an end to impunity — Details verified videos, eyewitness accounts, medical evidence and investigation limitations.
Deaths in Iran’s crackdown on protests reach more than 7,000, activists say — Independent reporting comparing activist and official totals while noting AP could not independently establish the toll.
Iranian government says 3,117, mostly civilians, killed in unrest — Reports Iran’s substantially lower official toll and its competing account of responsibility for deaths.

This assesses evidence and presentation; it is not an overall truth verdict.

Reassess

⚠ Paid reassessment incurs a charge. Opening this page does not start a run or incur a charge.

To request a new assessment, sign in to My library, watch this record, and select Request new assessment. Requests await separate approval and do not themselves start a paid run.

A new assessment may differ. Earlier published results remain in history.

Open My library

Assessment history

Published assessment trend

Available public snapshots only; this is not a count of all executions. Corrections may include earlier scores. Gaps mean not scored or not recorded. Different scores do not establish changed source evidence.

Evidence support — solid blueBalance & context — dashed purpleTransparency — dotted green

Reassess ⚠

Recorded public scores (0–100)
Date	Evidence support	Balance & context	Transparency
2026-10-03 (current)	86	48	42